Denita’s Choice
Posted: December 13th, 2011 | Author: Michael Goldstein | | 8 Comments »
What would you do? That is today’s question.
The New York Times has a huge story on a for-profit company called K12.
A look at the company’s operations, based on interviews and a review of school finances and performance records, raises serious questions about whether K12 schools — and full-time online schools in general — benefit children or taxpayers, particularly as state education budgets are being slashed.
What’s the reporter’s lede?
Nearly 60 percent of its students are behind grade level in math. Nearly 50 percent trail in reading. A third do not graduate on time. And hundreds of children, from kindergartners to seniors, withdraw within months after they enroll.
By Wall Street standards, though, Agora is a remarkable success that has helped enrich K12 Inc., the publicly traded company that manages the school.
Let’s dig deeper.
The article’s lead character is Denita Alhammadi. She’s a Memphis parent of 2 kids. She chooses a K12 online school. Then she spends up to 6 hours per day at home supervising her kids while they learn online.
Let’s examine things from her point of view. Why did she choose this school?
Like many parents who move their children to online schools, she had worried about violence.
The Times article does not further explore Mrs. Alhammadi’s choice. The reporter continues:
But no single reason leads families to make the switch. The students are a broadly diverse group, ranging from entertainers and athletes in training to children with cancer, seizure disorders, peanut allergies or behavioral problems. Some have been expelled from regular schools. In many cases their parents are simply dissatisfied.
Kathryn Ubiarco, whose son and daughter are also enrolled in Tennessee, said that her daughter’s school in Memphis had not been teaching her to read. “There’s no way to come up with the B that she got in reading last year,” Ms. Ubiarco said. “The child can’t read.” She believes the virtual school curriculum is more rigorous.
Let’s go back to “worried about violence.” I googled Denita Alhammadi. Turns out she was featured in a Memphis newspaper story back in July.
“The reason I pulled him of Memphis City Schools is because he had to deal with bullying,” Alhammadi said after an informational meeting K12 hosted last week in Memphis.
And
For Alhammadi, the last straw was when Memphis school leaders classified her son “ADHD,” attention deficit hyperactive disorder.
“My son is an advanced learner. Of course he’s going to be bored if he finishes way ahead of everyone else and has to just sit there.”
So now we have 3 reasons. ADHD diagnosis – which are often combined with recommendations of medication. Bullying – being on the receiving end of violence. And I would add: fear that her son would join a gang – often the logical response to bullying.
The Times article on K12 examines the kid and parent experience in the online school. That is good journalism.
But this is a huge article. Why not examine Denita’s alternative?
Her son is 13. What is the nearby high school?
Through some internet sleuthing, I came up with a home address. There are two high schools within 3 miles: Craigmont and Raleigh Egypt. Both are on the state’s “High Priority” list because of persistently low academic performance.
Here’s a recent article. The headline is: “Gunshots force suspension of football game at Raleigh-Egypt.”
Shortly after 8 p.m., shots rang out and players from both teams were reportedly told to “get down.” The game was suspended with 4:38 left in the first half and Craigmont leading 34-28.
Details on the exact location of the gunshots were unavailable.
Let’s skip the obvious: they need some new defensive schemes. 34-28 in the first half?
Snark aside, shootings can happen anywhere. Let’s not read too much into one incident.
Oh wait. A different shooting happened 2 weeks before that?
On Oct. 7, police arrested three teenagers at Raleigh-Egypt who were firing shots from a vehicle after a football game. Two 17-year-olds and a 16-year-old were arrested after officers recovered two guns from a Nissan SUV the teens were occupying.
Well, Mrs. Alhammadi could require her son to stay away from football games.
Of course there’s this recent story:
Action News 5′s Nick Paranjape vistied a wooded area, about 3-to-5 acres of land, next to Raleigh-Egypt High School; an area commonly known as “the cut”.
Many students use the path as a “shortcut” to get home. Others use it for something else.
Justin Hunter, a senior at Raleigh-Egypt High, walks through “the cut”.
“I kept hearing the cut, the cut, the cut. I said wait, wait, what is the cut,” says Memphis City School Board member, Stephanie Gatewood.
Gatewood eventually found out what it was and what happens there.
“Gang initiation, smoking, sexual intercourse. Pretty much anything you can think of that’s not positive,” says Hunter.
What about during class? This was uploaded by a Raleigh-Egypt student in 2010.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bvp2OJfAFwI&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q%3D%2522raleigh%2Begypt%2522%26source%3Dvideo%26cd%3D12%26ved%3D0CEIQtwIwATgK%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.youtube.com%252Fwatch%253Fv%253DBvp2OJfAFwI%26ei%3DAWbnTvHTBIT50gHe263eCQ%26usg%3DAFQjCNGC1L04biLqu9HegF4j4oz53GJsIg%26sig2%3D1pNYC6TEEuhbyH9_KpZSfw&ytsession=AuEJKGsvSWAAKjgtWzYcOEoyR4MkoEKy_v1MPAbk9mjuU5vigFlhV4dKs1Q00iayTayqFQccs1XikmLNGlVtJy-F2ZcJS4x9LcmpXAAFBw4qtZhL2RK1RdSGgYBURL7e-DTX3sv1vhzwKLeoTg6cjcOu6h8k1_fP963JUUGyBSB3XeTp_TT0hiSwGgTb38lQdMZKxIFszPoB-eefiYLUj8rqiiY8oD0gfZg_JKcEWye2RmSCSaBuJdffTIjaVNB6KAFG2UFNBKSYmelF2aw5xRNyVzBWR6aIpE7d_sHxfGA&has_verified=1
That’s what she is avoiding for her 2 children.
What is she embracing in terms of the online school? The Times paints a portrait.
Ms. Alhammadi, who runs her tiny school like boot camp, has hidden Romeo’s computer login so she has control. Otherwise, he would skip the lessons and move straight to the online test — a habit cited by critics of K12’s curriculum.
As two frisky cats run back and forth, Romeo raises his hand — a formality required by his mother — and asks to leave the room. He returns with headphones and plugs them into his computer. As he lip syncs Rihanna’s hit “Umbrella” it becomes clear that Romeo is not listening to any lesson. “I concentrate better with my music,” he says.
On his computer screen, a series of multiple choice questions ask him to select the correct answer to algebraic equations using negative numbers. Romeo scores a 67 percent.
When Romeo moves to science, he misses a question on the definition of matter.
“Romeo, Romeo,” his mother says. “If you had been studying appropriately, you would have found out that there are lots of properties of matter. And you got to take all those elements to build matter. Because elements are gas, solids, liquid.”
Romeo is scheduled for a virtual session with his assigned teacher and class at 1 p.m. But when he signs into the class, no one else is there. “Wow, the room is completely empty,” he says. He types, “Anyone here?” There is no response.
* * * *
K12 has a market cap of $1 billion. And a P/E of 66. That means the market thinks it has huge growth potential. (Mature companies, like General Electric, tend to have P/E in the 15 range).
Do I hope some other company comes along and creates a much better product for Romeo? Yes.
Do I hope that new competition, whether for profit or nonprofit, topples K12? Yes.
Is it annoying that some guys are getting rich off this? Yes.
Is it ridonkulous that the largest shareholder is Michael Milken, the junk bond king from the 1980s? Yes.
With all that said, will more parents choose online charters (combined with home schooling) in the coming years, and will taxpayers underwrite more of these schools? Yes.
Glenn Reynolds writes:
We’re also starting to see the deflation of what might be called a “lower education bubble” – that is, the constant flow of more and more money into K-12 education without any significant degree of buyer resistance, in spite of the often low quality of the education it purchases…
Perhaps there’s still a role for teaching children to sit up straight and form lines, but perhaps not. Certainly the rapidly increasing willingness of parents to try homeschooling, charter schools, online school, and other alternative approaches suggests that a lot of people are unhappy with the status quo.
Mrs. Alhammadi has has an unappealing choice. Traditional high-poverty school versus home-schooling her kid with the help of a weak online product. Is she better off having this choice, versus no choice? Yes.
And my final question:
What would you do in her situation?


Great post. Now that you’ve done the reporter’s job for him, please tell me you’ll send a letter to NYT’s “public editor” with this stuff. They’re pretty good at publishing focused critiques like this, and the editor is usually pretty thoughtful in response.
Your question of “what would you do?” gets at the heart of all arguments in the choice debate. Of course individuals will make choices that are individuals’ best interest. This is precisely the problem with market-based education reform. It allows select parents (usually those with the most connections/resources) an escape hatch from a system that doesn’t serve them. It is impossible to blame individual parents in this scenario for doing what’s best for their children. The problem is that the choice reduces parents to consumers and conflates “choice” with democratic ideals. It ignores that race and class severely limit those choices.
Denita’s choice is a false choice. Or a Hobson’s Choice. Or just a plain shitty choice. Go to a unsafe under-performing public school or go to K12.com, which even you admit, Michael, is a pretty shady purveyor of “education.” In the end, your individual economic resources and your individual savvy determine the “choices” you have. Pooling community resources to support the “public good” of education has less and less meaning in our discourse on ed reform, just as market-based forces would have it. Rather than demanding increased funding and support for public schools, we’re settling for corporations trying their hand at the education game. We’re all the poorer for it.
Hi James, I didn’t even know the NYT still had the public editor….
Hi Chris, thanks for the note. We agree, what a bad choice she has. But where we may part ways — I think she’s better off having the choice.
I’m surprised, though, to see your preference for “demanding increased funding.” No need to demand — we’ve done just that, without much success.
I don’t know the Memphis data. But inflation adjusted spending in Boston schools has doubled since Ed Reform passed here in 1993.
This is not truly a choice if the kid isn’t actually receiving any education, is it? There seem to be no stardards by which this particular school is succeeding, yet, because it fits in with a culture that increasingly demonizes public education and educators as the problem, it’s growing while other public schools shrink. We would never put 60 kids in a real life classroom or leave an elementary school child unattended and isolated for the bulk of his school day; why is this an acceptable practice here?
I’d my kid at home in a second if there was a question of him getting shot at school. But I wouldn’t pretend I was making a choice about his education when it’s evident from this article that he wouldn’t be getting one. And I’d be lobbying to shut this joke down and provide an actual choice- adding another failing option that promotes a different political philosophy about education and teachers, but that still doesn’t teach kids anything, isn’t a choice for parents. It’s a choice for policy wonks and politicians to bat around, write about, and discuss.
Hi Amanda, good stuff.
Agree — not only is there no standard by which this school is succeeding, it seems to be “actively” failing by the standard of test scores (though I’d love to see the value-added data instead of the raw).
It’s very unpleasant intellectually for you and me — who know what a great teacher and tutor can do — to engage with this situation. The nearby traditional school is wholly unacceptable, and has almost no plausible chance of improvement.
And as an educator, you and I can try to provide an actual choice (irrespective of whether we shut this down by getting parents to choose us instead, or by regulation).
But I do think it’s an “actual” choice from the mom’s point of view. Something that doesn’t come close to meeting the bar from our point of view, but which is potentially an improvement from someone else’s point of view….there’s real value there. I.e., 2 types of value.
The potential value of this particular crappy online school in giving Romeo a day-to-day experience that is a 3 out of 10 instead of a 1 out of 10. And the value of simply having a choice.
Michael,
Your blog and analysis of the Times coeverage is of course one of the wonderful things about things about the Internet.
I read the story and thought it was interesting, perhaps with a bit of an axe to grind against Noble. But your additions to their reporting really make for a much more interesting tale.
Last week the Times published an essay by a former deputy superintendant claining small high schools had ‘proven’ to boost graduation rates. Despite the fact that a careful read of the best data available do not in fact prove this to be the case.
I emailed the editor but have received no reply. That said, reasoned observations are an important to holding mass media honest, even if they do not respond directly.
Like you mention to Chris about Boston, we have doubled school spending to $24 billion here in Gotham in the last 10 years. Without really having much to show for it, sadly.
Lots of experimenting with digital schooling, but at my daughter’s local k-5 school, the technology program is still woeful.
Keep up the good work.
Thanks Matthew.
Yep on the small high schools thing. In Boston they took some Gates money and chopped a few of the traditional 1,000 student schools into 3 different floors, each called a school. No easily discernible net gains.
I’m not sure what is going on here, but this is a choice for parents to make, it an option and not for everyone. It’s a lot of hard work and I’m real tired of everyone criticizing K12 everyone school system has to purchase supplies and books, those supplier are not a non-profit company. I am very happy with my choice and know that my children are being educated better than in B&M. Looking at their standardize test scores I would say a lot better.