This blog is about 3 stories.

1. The start-up year for a very different sort of Graduate School of Education. It's a tiny subset of...
2. ...The much larger, national effort to transform teaching and teachers. That is a big subset of...
3. ...A multi-kajillion-dollar effort to improve the ludicrous odds (7% or so) of a poor kid ever getting a college diploma.

My Debate Note

Posted: October 4th, 2012 | Author: | | 1 Comment »

While I’m no political pundit, I am a self-appointed arithmetic pundit.

Mitt Romney:

You put $90 billion into green jobs. And I — look, I’m all in favor of green energy. $90 billion, that would have hired two million teachers. $90 billion.

Um,

I guess it could have hired 2 million teachers for one year at $45k/per and no benefits.

And then you have had to fire all of them, b/c the $90 billion would be fully spent.

If you were funding new teachers that you intended to keep on the job, however, the cost isn’t $45,000 for one year. It’s $1 million to $4 million apiece, depending on the discount rate, annual salary increases and pensions, and whether you want to model a whole career (say 30 years) or forever (like an endowed professorship).

I guess the sentence “You could have hired 2 million teachers with $90 billion” worked better in Romney’s pre-debate focus groups than the more precise “You could have hired 30,000 teachers…”


One Comment on “My Debate Note”

  1. 1: TOM BOWLER said at 2:44 pm on October 5th, 2012:

    Thanks for the math. I guess this was one of the “Zingers” they were talking about slinging before the debates. It’s so transparently stupid. I
    guess he’s not that good at math either. I think it shows that he doesn’t relly “care”. He’s not :concerned”. These areproblems of “the 47% he won’t worry about”. Thanks for the clarification and expansion of the real costs of education and teachers and carreers.


Leave a Reply